الجمعة، 16 ديسمبر 2011

Please read:
A personal appeal from
Wikipedia author Dr. Sengai Podhuvan
Read now
North Yemen Civil War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Yemen Civil War" and "Yemeni Civil War" redirect here. For other uses, see Yemen Civil War (disambiguation).
North Yemen Civil War
Part of the Cold War

Royalist Yemeni forces try to repel an Egyptian armored attack
Date 1962–70
Location North Yemen
Result Republican victory
Mutawakkilite Kingdom of Yemen
Saudi Arabia
European mercenaries
Yemen Arab Republic
Commanders and leaders
Imam Al-Badr
Bruce Conde
Faisal ibn Abdelaziz
King Hussein Abdullah as-Sallal
Gamal Abdel-Nasser
Abdel Hakim Amer
20,000 semi-regulars (1965)[1]
200,000 tribesmen (1965)[1]
Hundreds of mercenaries[2] 3,000 soldiers (1964)[3]
70,000 soldiers (1965)[4]
Casualties and losses
100,000 dead[5] 26,000 dead[6]
The North Yemen Civil War was fought in North Yemen between royalists of the Mutawakkilite Kingdom of Yemen and factions of the Yemen Arab Republic from 1962 to 1970. The war began with a coup d'état carried out by the republican leader, Abdullah as-Sallal, which dethroned the newly crowned Imam al-Badr and declared Yemen a republic under his presidency. The Imam escaped to the Saudi Arabian border and rallied popular support.
On the royalist side Jordan and Saudi Arabia supplied military aid, and Britain gave diplomatic support, while the republicans were supported by Egypt and allegedly received warplanes from the Soviet Union.[7] Both foreign irregular and conventional forces were involved. The Egyptian President, Gamal Abdel Nasser, supported the republicans with as many as 70,000 Egyptian troops. Despite several military moves and peace conferences, the war sank into a stalemate. Egypt's commitment to the war is considered to have been detrimental to its performance in the Six-Day War of June 1967, after which Nasser found it increasingly difficult to maintain his army's involvement and began to pull his forces out of Yemen.
By 1970, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia recognized the republic after al- Badr refused to cede Najran, Jizan and Aseer to Saudi Arabia in return of continued aid, his famous response was "Their people are the most worthy of it" and sensing the willingness of the coup forces to cede those lands to the Saudis a truce was signed. Egyptian military historians refer to the war in Yemen as their Vietnam,[2] and historian Michael Oren (current Israeli Ambassador to the U.S) wrote that Egypt's military adventure in Yemen was so disastrous that "the imminent Vietnam War could easily have been dubbed America's Yemen."[8]
Contents [hide]
1 Background
1.1 Yemen
1.2 Egypt
2 Coup d'état
2.1 Plot
2.2 Execution
2.3 Aftermath
3 Diplomacy
3.1 Operation Hard-surface
4 Opposing forces
4.1 Royalists
4.2 Egypt
5 Egyptian offensives
5.1 Ramadan offensive
5.2 Haradh offensive
6 Alexandria summit and Erkwit ceasefire
7 Royalist offensive
8 Stalemate
9 Khamir, Jeddah and Haradh conferences
9.1 Khamir
9.2 Jeddah
9.3 Haradh
10 Nasser's "long-breath" strategy
10.1 Gas warfare
11 Egyptian withdrawal
12 Siege of San'a
13 Aftermath
14 See also
15 References
15.1 Bibliography

Imam Ahmad bin Yahya, who had inherited the Yemeni throne in 1948, was known as "Ahmad the devil" by his enemies.[9] In 1955, Iraq-trained Colonel Ahmad Thalaya led a revolt against him. A group of soldiers under his command surrounded the royal palace of Al Urdhi at Taiz, a fortified stronghold where the Imam lived with his harem, the royal treasure, an arsenal of modern weapons, and a 150 strong palace-guard, and demanded Ahmad's abdication. Ahmad agreed, but demanded that his son, Imam al-Badr succeed him. Thalaya refused, preferring the King's half brother, the Emir Saif el Islam Abdullah, the 48-year-old Foreign Minister. While Abdullah began forming a new government, Ahmad opened the treasury coffers and secretly began buying off the besieging soldiers. After five days, the number of besiegers was reduced from 600 to 40. Ahmad then came out of the palace,wearing a devil's mask and wielding a long scimitar, terrifying the beseigers. He slashed two sentries dead before exchanging the sword for a sub-machine gun and leading his 150 guards onto the roof of the palace to begin a direct attack on the rebels. After 28 hours, 23 rebels and one palace guard were dead and Thalaya gave up. Abdullah was later reported executed, and Thalaya was publicly decapitated.[10]

Imam al-Badr outside his cave on Jabal Sheda. With him is his cousin, Prince Hassan bin Hussein.
In March 1958, al-Badr arrived in Damascus to tell Nasser of Yemen's adherence to the UAR. However, Ahmad was to keep his throne and his absolute power, and the arrangement constituted only a close alliance.[11] In 1959 Ahmad went to Rome to treat his arthritis, rheumatism, heart trouble and, reportedly, drug addiction. Fights between tribal chieftains erupted, and al-Badr unsuccessfully tried to buy off the dissidents by promising "reforms",[12] including the appointment of a representative council, more army pay and promotions. Upon his return, Ahmad swore to crush the "agents of the Christians".[12] He ordered the decapitation of one of his subjects and the amputation of the left hand and right foot of 15 others, in punishment for the murder of a high official the previous June. Al-Badr was only rebuked for his leniency, but the Yemeni radio stopped broadcasting army officers' speeches, and talks of reforms were silenced.[12]
In June 1961, Ahmad was still recovering from an assassination attempt four months earlier, and moved out of the capital, Taiz, into the pleasure palace of Sala. Already Defense and Foreign Minister, Badr became acting Prime Minister and Interior Minister as well. Despite being Crown Prince, al-Badr still needed to be picked by the Ulema in San'a. Al-Badr was not popular with the Ulema due to his association with Nasser, and the Ulema had refused Ahmad's request to ratify Badr's title.[13] Imam Ahmad died on September 18, 1962, and was succeeded by his son, Imam al-Badr.[2] One of al-Badr's first acts was to appoint Colonel Abdullah Sallal, a known socialist and Nasserist, as commander of the palace guard.[9]

Map of Yemen.
Nasser had looked to a regime change in Yemen since 1957 and finally put his desires into practice in January 1962 by giving the Free Yemen Movement office space, financial support, and radio air time. Anthony Nutting's biography of Gamal Abdel-Nasser identifies several factors that led the Egyptian President to send expeditionary forces to Yemen. These included the unraveling of the union with Syria in 1961, which dissolved his United Arab Republic (UAR), damaging his prestige. A quick decisive victory in Yemen could help him recover leadership of the Arab world. Nasser also had his reputation as an anti-colonial force, setting his sights on ridding South Yemen, and its strategic port city of Aden, of British forces.[2]
Mohamed Heikal, a chronicler of Egyptian national policy decision making and confidant of Nasser, wrote in For Egypt Not For Nasser, that he had engaged Nasser on the subject of supporting the coup in Yemen. Heikal argued that Sallal's revolution could not absorb the massive number of Egyptian personnel who would arrive in Yemen to prop up his regime, and that it would be wise to consider sending Arab nationalist volunteers from throughout the Middle East to fight alongside the republican Yemeni forces, suggesting the Spanish Civil War as a template from which to conduct events in Yemen. Nasser refused Heikal's ideas, insisting on the need to protect the Arab nationalist movement. Nasser was convinced that a regiment of Egyptian Special Forces and a wing of fighter-bombers would be able to secure the Yemeni republican coup d'état.
Nasser's considerations for sending troops to Yemen may have included the following: (1) impact of his support to the Algerian War of Independence from 1954–62; (2) Syria breaking up from Nasser's United Arab Republic (UAR) in 1961; (3) taking advantage of a breach in British and French relations, which had been strained by Nasser's support for the FLN in Algeria and primarily for his efforts to undermine the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO), which caused the downfall of the Iraqi monarchy in 1958; (4) confronting imperialism, which Nasser saw as Egypt's destiny; (5) guaranteeing dominance of the Red Sea from the Suez Canal to the Bab-el-Mandeb strait; (6) retribution against the Saudi royal family, whom Nasser felt had undermined his union with Syria.[2]
[edit]Coup d'état


Author Dana Adams Schmidt with President Sallal, March 1967.
At least four plots were going on in San'a. One was headed by Lieutenant Ali Abdul al Moghny. Another one was conceived by Sallal. His plot merged into a third conspiracy prodded by the Hashid tribal confederation in revenge for Ahmad's execution of their paramount sheik and his son. A fourth plot was shaped by several young princes who sought to get rid of al-Badr but not the imamate. The only men who knew about those plots were the Egyptian chargé d'affaires, Abdul Wahad, and al-Badr himself. The day after Ahmad's death, al-Badr's minister in London, Ahmad al Shami, sent him a telegram urging him not to go to San'a to attend his father's funeral because several Egyptian officers, as well as some of his own, were plotting against him. Al-Badr's private secretary did not pass this message to him, pretending he did not understand the code. Al-Badr may have been saved by the gathering of thousands of men at the funeral. Al-Badr learned of the telegram only later.[14]
A day before the coup Wahad, who claimed to have information from the Egyptian intelligence service, warned al-Badr that Sallal and fifteen other officers, including Moghny, were planning a revolution. Wahad's purpose was to cover himself and Egypt in case the coup failed, to prompt the plotters into immediate action, and drive Sallal and Moghny into a single conspiracy. Sallal got imamic permission to bring in the armed forces. Then, Wahad went to Moghny, and told him that al-Badr had somehow discovered the plot, and that he must act immediately before the other officers would be arrested. He told him that if he could hold San'a, the radio and the airport for three days, the whole of Europe would recognize him.[15]
Sallal ordered that the military academy in San'a go on full alert — opening all armories and issuing weapons to all junior officers and troops. On the evening of September 25, Sallal gathered known leaders of the Yemeni nationalist movement and other officers who had sympathized or participated in the military protests of 1955. Each officer and cell would be given orders and would commence as soon as the shelling of al-Badr's palace began. Key areas that would be secured included Al-Bashaer palace (al-Badr's palace); Al-Wusul palace (Reception area for dignitaries); The radio station; The telephone exchange; Qasr al-Silaah (The Main Armory); and The central security headquarters (Intelligence and Internal Security).[2]
At 10:30 p.m., al-Badr heard tanks moving through the nearby streets, and reckoned that they were the ones Sallal had asked to move. At 11.45 p.m. the army began shelling the palace. Al-Badr seized a machine gun and began firing at the tanks, although they were out of range. Moghny sent an armored car to Sallal's house and invited him to the headquarters, where he asked him to join the revolution. Sallal agreed, on condition that he would be President. Moghny agreed.[16] The coup d'état was carried out with 13 tanks from the Badr Brigade, six armored cars, two mobile artillery cannons, and two anti-air guns. Command and control of the forces loyal to the coup would take place at the Military Academy. A unit of revolutionary officers accompanied by tanks headed towards Al-Bashaer Palace. By microphone, they voiced an appeal to the imamate Guard for tribal solidarity and to surrender Imam al-Badr, who would be sent peacefully into exile. The imamate Guard refused to surrender and opened fire, prompting the revolutionary leaders to respond with tank and artillery shells. The rebels planned to deploy tanks and artillery in the coup.[2]
The battle at the palace continued until guards surrendered to the revolutionaries the following morning. The radio station was first to fall, secured after a loyalist officer was killed and resistance collapsed. The armory was perhaps the easiest target, as a written order from Sallal was sufficient to open the storage facility, beat the royalists, and secure rifles, artillery and ammunition for the resistance. The telephone exchange likewise fell without any resistance. At the Al-Wusul Palace, revolutionary units remained secure under the guise of granting and protecting diplomats and dignitaries staying there to greet the new Imam of Yemen. By late morning on September 26, all areas of San'a were secure and the radio broadcast that Imam al-Badr had been overthrown by the new revolutionary government in power. Revolutionary cells in the cities of Taiz, Al-Hujja and the port city of Hodeida then began securing arsenals, airports and port facilities.[2]

Abdullah Sallal (center) and the heads of the coup in October, 1962.
Al-Badr and his personal servants managed to escape through a door in the garden wall in the back of the palace. Because of the curfew declared, they had to avoid the main streets. They decided to escape individually and meet in the village of Gabi al Kaflir, where they were reunited after a forty-five minute walk.[17] Sallal had to defeat a fellow revolutionary, Al-Baidani, an intellectual holding a doctorate degree, who did not share in Nasser's vision. On September 28, the radio announced al-Badr's death.[2] Sallal gathered tribesmen in San'a and proclaimed: "The corrupt monarchy which ruled for a thousand years was a disgrace to the Arab nation and to all humanity. Anyone who tries to restore it is an enemy of God and man!"[18] By then, he had learned that al-Badr was still alive and had made his way to Saudi Arabia.[18]
Egyptian General Ali Abdul Hameed was dispatched by plane, and arrived on September 29 to assess the situation and needs of the Yemeni Revolutionary Command Council. Egypt sent a battalion of Special Forces (Saaqah) on a mission to act as personal guards for Sallal. They arrived at Hodeida on October 5.[2] Fifteen days after he had left San'a, al-Badr sent a man ahead to the Saudi Arabia to announce that he was alive. He then went there himself, crossing the border near Khobar, at the north-western edge of the kingdom.[19]

Canadian trade commissioner Ian Verner Macdonald poses with rebels
Saudi Arabia, fearing Nasserist encroachment, moved troops along its border with Yemen, as the Jordanian monarch dispatched his Army chief of staff for discussions with al-Badr's uncle, Prince Hassan. Between October 2–8 four Saudi cargo planes left Saudi Arabia loaded with arms and military material for Yemeni royalist tribesmen; however, the pilots defected to Aswan. Ambassadors from Bonn, London, Washington D.C. and Amman supported the Imam while ambassadors from Cairo, Rome and Belgrade declared support for the republican revolution.[2] The USSR was the first nation to recognize the new republic, and Nikita Khrushchev cabled Sallal: "Any act of aggression against Yemen will be considered an act of aggression against the Soviet Union."[9]
The United States was concerned that the conflict might spread to other parts of the Middle East. President John F. Kennedy rushed off notes to Nasser, Feisal, Hussein and Sallal. His plan was that Nasser's troops should withdraw from Yemen while Saudi Arabia and Jordan halted their aid to the Imam. Nasser agreed to pull out his forces only after Jordan and Saudi Arabia "stop all aggressive operations on the frontiers".[20] Feisal and Hussein rejected Kennedy's plan, since it would involve US recognition of the "rebels".[20] They insisted that the US should withhold recognition of Sallal's Presidency since the Imam might still regain control of Yemen, and that Nasser had no intention of pulling out. The Saudis argued that Nasser wanted their oil fields and was hoping to use Yemen as a springboard for revolt in the rest of the Arabian peninsula.[20] King Hussein of Jordan was also convinced that Nasser's target was Saudi Arabia's oil, and that if the Saudis went, he would be next.[21]
Sallal declared "I warn America that if it does not recognize the Yemen Arab Republic, I shall not recognize it!".[22] US Chargé d'Affaires in Taiz, Robert Stookey, reported that the republican regime was in full control of the country, except in some border areas. However, the British government was insisting on the strength of the Imam's tribal support. A letter written by President Kennedy to Faisal dated October 25, which was kept confidential until January 1963, said: "You may be assured of full US support for the maintenance of Saudi Arabian integrity".[23] American jet aircraft twice staged shows of force in Saudi Arabia. The first involved six F-100 jets staging stunt-flying demonstrations over Riyadh and Jeddah;[24] on the second, two jet bombers and a giant jet transport, while returning to their base near Paris after a visit to Karachi, Pakistan, put on a demonstration over Riyadh.[25]
Sallal proclaimed Yemen's "firm policy to honor its international obligations",[22] including a 1934 treaty pledging respect for Britain's Aden Protectorate. Nasser promised to "start gradual withdrawal"[22] of its 18,000-man force, "provided Saudi and Jordanian forces also retire from border regions",[22] but would leave his technicians and advisers behind. On December 19, the US became the 34th nation to recognize the Yemen Arab Republic.[22][25] United Nations recognition followed that of the US by a day. The UN continued to consider the republic the only authority in the land and completely ignored the royalists.[26]
Britain, with its commitment to South Arabia and its base in Aden, considered the Egyptian invasion a real threat. Recognition of the republic posed a problem to several treaties Britain had signed with the sheiks and sultans of the South Arabian Federation. Saudi Arabia urged the British to identify themselves with the royalists. On the other hand, there were some in the British Foreign Office who believed Britain could buy security for Aden by recognizing the republic. However, Britain eventually decided not to recognize. Iran, Turkey and most of western Europe also withheld recognition. The republic did receive the recognition of West Germany, Italy, Canada and Australia, as well as the remaining Arab governments, Ethiopia and the entire communist bloc.[27]
A week after the American recognition, Sallal boasted at a military parade the republic had rockets that could strike "the palaces of Saudi Arabia",[28] and in early January the Egyptians again bombed and strafed Najran, a Saudi Arabian city near the Yemenite border. The US responded with another aerial demonstration over Jeddah and a destroyer joined on January 15. The US reportedly agreed to send antiaircraft batteries and radar-control equipment to Najran.[28] In addition, Ralph Bunche was sent to Yemen, where he met with Sallal and Egyptian Field Marshal Abdel Hakim Amer. On March 6 Bunche was in Cairo, where Nasser reportedly assured him that he would withdraw his troops from Yemen if the Saudis would stop supporting the royalists.[29]
[edit]Operation Hard-surface
While Bunche was reporting to UN Secretary-General U Thant, the United States Department of State sought the help of ambassador Ellsworth Bunker. His mission was based on a decision made by the National Security Council, which was conceived by McGeorge Bundy and Robert Komer. The idea behind what became known as "Operation Hard-surface"[30] was to trade American protection (or the appearance of it) for a Saudi commitment to halt aid to the royalists, on the basis of which the Americans would get Nasser to withdraw his troops. The operation would consist of "eight little planes."[30]
Bunker arrived in Riyadh on March 6. Faisal refused Bunker's offer, which was also hitched to pledges of reform. The original instructions for Operation Hard-surface were that American planes would "attack and destroy"[31] any intruders over Saudi air space, but were later changed to read that the Saudis could defend themselves if attacked. Bunker evidently stuck to the original formula and stressed that if only Faisal would halt his aid to the royalists, the US would be able pressure Nasser to withdraw. Faisal eventually accepted the offer, and Bunker went on to meet with Nasser in Beirut, where the Egyptian President repeated the assurance he had given Bunche.[31]
The Bunche and Bunker mission gave birth to the idea of an observer mission to Yemen, which eventually became the United Nations Yemen Observation Mission. The U.N. observer team, which would be set up by the former UN Congo commander, Swedish Major General Carl von Horn. His disengagement agreement called for (1) Establishment of a demilitarized zone extending twenty kilometers on either side of a demarcated Saudi Arabian Yemen border, from which all military equipment was to be excluded; (2) Stationing of UN observers within this zone on both sides of the border to observe, report and prevent any continued attempt by the Saudis to supply royalist forces.[32]
On April 30, von Horn was sent to discover what kind of force was required. A few days later, he met with Amer in Cairo and found out that Egypt had no intention of drawing all her troops from Yemen. After a few more days, he was told by the Saudi deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, Omar Saqqaff, that the Saudis would not accept any attempt by Egypt to leave security forces after their withdrawal.[32] Saudi Arabia had already been cutting back on its support to the royalists, in part because Egypt's projected plan for unity with Syria and Iraq made Nasser seem too dangerous. By that time, the war cost Egypt $1,000,000 a day and nearly 5,000 casualties. Though promising to remove her troops, Egypt had the privilege of leaving an unspecified number for the "training"[33] of Yemen's republican army.[33]
In June, von Horn went to San'a, unsuccessfully trying to achieve the objective of 1) ending Saudi aid to the royalists, 2) creating a 25-mile demilitarized strip along the Saudi border, and 3) supervising the phased withdrawal of the Egyptian troops.[34] In September, von Horn cabled his resignation to Thant, who announced that the mission would continue, due to "oral assurances" by Egypt and Saudi Arabia to continue financing it.[35] The number of Egyptian troops increased, and in the end of January, the "Hard-surface" squadron was withdrawn after a wrangle with Faisal. On September 4, 1964, the UN admitted failure and withdrew its mission.[36]
[edit]Opposing forces


Yemeni Prime Minister, Prince Hassan, talking to tribesmen outside his cave in Wadi Amlah, December 1962.
Imam al-Badr led his campaign with the princes of the house of Hamidaddin. Those included Hassan bin Yahya, who had come from New York, Mohamed bin Hussein, Mohamed bin Ismail, Ibrahim al Kipsy, and Abdul Rahman bin Yahya. At fifty-six, Hassan bin Yahya was the oldest and most distinguished. Prince Hassan was made Prime Minister and Commander-in-Chief. The Imam was joined by his childhood pen pal, American Bruce Conde, who set up the post office and would later rise to the rank of general in the Royalist forces.[37]
In 1963, the Saudis spent $15 million to equip royalist tribes, hire hundreds of European mercenaries, and establish their own radio station. Pakistan, which saw a chance to make money in the conflict, extended rifles to the royalists. Remnants of the Imam's Army also had elements of the Saudi National Guard fight alongside its ranks. Iran subsidized royalist forces on and off, as the Shah felt compelled to provide al-Badr (a Shiite Zeidi) with financing. The British allowed convoys of arms to flow through one of its allies in Northern Yemen, the Sheriff of Beijan, who was protected by the British administration in Aden. British military planes conduced night operations to resupply al-Badr's forces.[2] The MI6 was responsible for contacting the royalists, and used the services of a private company belonging to Colonel David Stirling, founder of the Special Air Service (SAS), who recruited dozens of former SAS men as advisors to the royalists.[38] Britain participated in a $400 million British air defense program for Saudi Arabia. The Lyndon Johnson administration was more willing than Kennedy's to support long-range plans in support of the Saudi army. In 1965, the US authorized an agreement with the Corps of Engineers to supervise the construction of military facilities and in 1966 it sponsored a $100 million program which provided the Saudi forces with combat vehicles, mostly trucks. Faisal also initiated an Islamic alignment called the Islamic Conference, to counter Nasser's Arab socialism.[39]

Prince Abdullah Hussein (below, center) with his men soon after the Egyptian air attack in Wadi Hirran, December 1962.
The tribes of Southern Saudi Arabia and Northern Yemen were closely linked, and the Saudis enticed thousands of Yemeni workers in Saudi Arabia to assist the royalist cause. In addition to the Saudis and British, the Iraqis also sent plane loads of Baathist Yemenis to undermine Sallal's regime.[2] The royalists fought for the Imam despite his father's unpopularity. One sheik said "The Imams have ruled us for a thousand years. Some were good and some bad. We killed the bad ones sooner or later, and we prospered under the good ones". The hill tribes were Shia, like the Imam, while the Yemenis of the coast and the south were Sunni, as were most Egyptians. President Sallal was himself a mountain Shia fighting with lowland Sunnis. Al-Badr himself was convinced that he was Nasser's biggest target, saying "Now I'm getting my reward for befriending Nasser. We were brothers, but when I refused to become his stooge, he used Sallal against me. I will never stop fighting. I will never go into exile. Win or lose, my grave will be here".[40]
Al-Badr had formed two royalist armies - one under his uncle Prince Hassan in the east and one under his own control in the west. Both armies controlled most of the north and east of Yemen, including the towns of Harib and Marib. The provincial capital of Northern Yemen, Sadah, which would have given the Imam a key strategic road towards the main capital San'a, was controlled by the republicans. There were also areas like the town of Hajjah, where the royalists controlled the mountains while the Egyptians and republicans controlled the town and fortress. Mercenaries from France, Belgium and England, who had fought in Rhodesia, Malaya, Indochina and Algeria, were sent to assist the Imam in planning, training and giving the irregular forces the ability to communicate with one another and the Saudis. They trained tribesmen in the use of antitank weapons, such as the 106mm gun and in mining techniques. The numbers of mercenaries are estimated in the hundreds, although Egyptian sources at the time reported 15,000. Royalist tactics were confined to guerilla warfare, isolating conventional Egyptian and republican forces, and conducting attacks on supply lines.[2]

Prince Abdurrahman bin Yahya, youngest brother of the Iamam Ahmad, with a veteran of the imamic army, at Uqd.
Three decades after the war, former Mossad director, Shabtai Shavit, and Ariel Sharon both said Israel had been clandestinely involved in Yemen. Some of the royalist air drops were aided by the Israeli Air Force (IAF). The aircraft were contracted privately to the British mercenary operation and were either using Israeli air bases or Israeli transport planes themselves making the drops.[41]
According to "Haaretz" newspaper, one of the SAS advisers, Tony Boyle, contacted David Karon, the head of the Middle East department in the Tevel (Cosmos) section of the Mossad, and met with IAF commander Ezer Weizman and his officers. It was decided that the airdrops would be made.[38] The Israeli aircraft flew along the Saudi coastline. The Saudis did not have radar systems, and would later claim they were not aware of the airlifts. The Israeli planes would make the drops and then refuel in French Somaliland (now Djibouti) and return to Israel.[42] The airlifts were originally codenamed "Operation Gravy", but were later renamed "Operation Porcupine". The IAF's largest transport plane, the Stratofreighter, was recruited for the operation. The first flight took off in March 1964 from Tel Nof Airbase. During the sixth flight, Boyle suggested that the IAF would also bomb San'a. Weizman supported the idea and plans were made, but the Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff (Ramatkal) Yitzhak Rabin and Israeli Prime Minister, Levi Eshkol, denied him. The operation went on over a period of slightly more than two years, during which the Stratofreighter carried out 14 nighttime sorties from Tel Nof to Yemen.[38] The Mossad also operated several agents in Yemen. One of them, Baruch Mizrahi, was caught in 1967 and was imprisoned in Egypt. He was released in a prisoner exchange between Egypt and Israel following the Yom Kippur War in 1973.[42]

Colonel Hassan Ali Kamal, Egyptian chief of operations, at his desk in San'a.
Anwar Sadat was convinced that a regiment reinforced with aircraft could firmly secure Al-Sallal and his free officer movement, but within three months of sending troops to Yemen, Nasser realized that this would require a larger commitment than anticipated. A little less than 5,000 troops were sent in October 1962. Two months later, Egypt had 15,000 regular troops deployed. By late 1963, the number was increased to 36,000; and in late 1964, the number rose to 50,000 Egyptian troops in Yemen. In late 1965, the Egyptian troop commitment in Yemen was at 55,000 troops, which were broken into 13 infantry regiments of one artillery division, one tank division and several Special Forces as well as paratroop regiments. Ahmed Abu-Zeid, who served as Egypt's ambassador to royalist Yemen from 1957 to 1961, sent numerous reports on Yemen that did not reach Ministry of Defense officials. He warned Egyptian officials in Cairo, including Defense Minister Amer, that the tribes were difficult and had no sense of loyalty or nationhood. He opposed sending Egyptian combat forces and, arguing that only money and equipment be sent to the Yemeni Free Officers, and warned that the Saudis would finance the royalists.[2]
All the Egyptian field commanders complained of a total lack of topographical maps causing a real problem in the first months of the war. Commanders had difficulty planning military operations effectively or sending back routine and casualty reports without accurate coordinates. Field units were given maps that were only of use for aerial navigation. Chief of Egyptian Intelligence, Salah Nasr, admitted that information on Yemen was nonexistent. Egypt had not had an embassy in Yemen since 1961; therefore when Cairo requested information from the US ambassador to Yemen, all he provided was an economic report on the country.[2]

An Egyptian instructor at the San'a military academy showing a Yemeni how to use a bayonet affixed to a Mosin-Nagant rifle.
In 1963 and 1964 the Egyptians had five squadrons of aircraft in Yemen at airfields near San'a and Hodeida. They were using Yak-11 piston-engined fighters, MiG-15 and MiG-17 jet fighters, Ilyushin Il-28 twin-engined bombers, Ilyushin Il-14 twin-engined transports and Mil Mi-4 transport helicopters. They were also flying four-engined Tupolev bombers from bases in Egypt, such as Aswan. All the air crew were Egyptian, except for the Tupolev bombers which were thought to have mixed Egyptian and Russian personnel. The Ilyushin transports flying between Egypt and Hodeida had Russian crews.[43] Throughout the war, the Egyptians relied on airlift. In January 1964, when royalist forces placed San'a under siege, Egyptian Antonov heavy-lift cargo planes airlifted tons of food and kerosene into the region. The Egyptians estimate that hundreds of millions of dollars were spent to equip Egyptian and republican Yemeni forces, and in addition, Moscow refurbished the Al-Rawda Airfield outside San'a. The politburo saw a chance to gain a toehold on the Arabian Peninsula and accepted hundreds of Egyptian officers to be trained as pilots for service in the Yemen War.[2]
Egyptian air and naval forces began bombing and shelling raids in the Saudi southwestern city of Najran and the coastal town of Jizan, which were staging points for royalist forces. In response, the Saudis purchased a British Thunderbird air defense system and developed their airfield in Khamis Mushayt. Riyadh also attempted to convince Washington to respond on its behalf. President Kennedy sent only a wing of jet fighters and bombers to Dhahran Airbase, demonstrating to Nasser the seriousness of American commitment to defending U.S. interests in Saudi Arabia.[2]
[edit]Egyptian offensives

The Ramadan (straight) and Haradh (dotted) offensives.
The Egyptian General Staff divided the Yemen War into three operational objectives. The first was the air phase, it began with jet trainers modified to strafe and carry bombs and ended with three wings of fighter-bombers, stationed near the Saudi-Yemeni border. Egyptian sorties went along the Tiahma Coast of Yemen and into the Saudi towns of Najran and Jizan. It was designed to attack royalist ground formations and substitute the lack of Egyptian formations on the ground with high-tech air power. In combination with Egyptian air strikes, a second operational phase involved securing major routes leading to San'a, and from there secure key towns and hamlets. The largest offensive based on this operational tactic was the March 1963 "Ramadan Offensive" that lasted until February 1964, focused on opening and securing roads from San'a to Sadah to the North, and San'a to Marib to the East. The success of the Egyptian forces meant that royalist resistance could take refuge in hills and mountains to regroup and carry out hit-and-run offensives against republican and Egyptian units controlling towns and roads. The third strategic offensive was the pacification of tribes and their enticement to the republican government, meaning the expenditures of massive amounts of funds for humanitarian needs and outright bribery of tribal leaders.[2]
[edit]Ramadan offensive

A republican helicopter, captured early in the war by the royalists outside Marib.
The Ramadan offensive began in February 1963 when Amer and Sadat arrived in San'a. Amer asked Cairo to double the 20,000 men in Yemen, and in early February the first 5,000 of the reinforcement arrived. On February 18 a task force of fifteen tanks, twenty armored cars, eighteen trucks and numerous jeeps took off from San'a' moving northwards, heading for Sadah. More garrison troops followed. A few days later another task force, spearheaded by 350 men in tanks and armored cars, struck out from Sadah southeastwards toward Marib. The maneuvered into the Rub al-Khali desert, perhaps well into Saudi territory, and there they were built up by an airlift. Then they headed westwards. On February 25 they occupied Marib and on March 7 they took Harib. A royalist force of 1,500 men ordered down from Najran failed to stop them on their way out from Sadah. The royalist commander at Harib fled to Beihan, on the British-protected side of the border.[44] In the battle of El Argoup, 25 miles southeast of San'a, 500 royalists under Prince Abdullah's commanded attacked an Egyptian position on top of a sheer-sided hill that was fortified with six Soviet T-54 tanks, a dozen armored cars and entrenched machine guns. The royalists advanced in a thin skirmish line and were plastered by artillery, mortars and strafing planes. They replied with rifles, one mortar with 20 rounds, and a bazooka with four rounds. The battle lasted a week and cost the Egyptians three tanks, seven armored cars and 160 dead.[40] The Egyptians were now in positions from which they could hope to interdict the royalist movement of supplies in the mountains north and east of San'a'.[44]
In the beginning of April the royalists held a conference with Faisal in Riyadh. They decided to adopt new tactics, including attempts to get supplies around the positions now held by the Egyptians by using camels instead of trucks to cross the mountains to reach the positions east of San'a. Camel caravans from Beihan would swing into the Rub al-Khali and enter Yemen north of Marib. It was also decided that the royalists must now strengthen their operations west of the mountains with three "armies". By the end of April, they began to recover and claimed to have regained some of the positions the Egyptians had taken in the Jawf, particularly the small but strategic towns of Barat and Safra, both in the mountains between Sadah and the Jawf, and were able to move freely in the eastern Khabt desert. In the Jawf they claimed to have cleaned up all Egyptian strong-points except Hazm, and in the west the town of Batanah.[45]
[edit]Haradh offensive
On June 12, Egyptian infantry numbering at about 4,000, reinforced by the republican army and mercenaries from the Aden protectorate invaded the town of Beit Adaqah, about thirty miles west of San'a, where Prince Abdullah held a front extending from the Hodeida road, through Kawakaban province, to southern Hajjah. In two days, the attackers advanced about twelve miles, before being repelled by a counter-attack. The royalists admitted about 250 casualties. Next, the Egyptians attacked Sudah, about 100 miles north-west of San'a. They used the unpopularity of the local royalist commander to bribe several local sheiks and occupied the town unopposed. After a month, the sheiks sent delegations to al-Badr soliciting pardons and asking for guns and money with which to fight the Egyptians. Al-Badr sent new forces and managed to regain the surroundings of Sudah, though not the town itself.[46]

A Soviet-manufactured armored car, captured by royalist guerrillas from the Egyptians near Haradh.
On August 15, the Egyptians launched an offensive from their major north-western base in Haradh. They had 1,000 troops and about 2,000 republicans. The plan, as interpreted by British intelligence, seemed to have been to cut the thirty-mile track southward through the mountains from the Saudi border at Khoubah to al-Badr's headquarters in the Qara mountains near Washa, and then to split into two task forces, one moving east through Washa to the headquarters and the other north-eastwards along the track to the Saudi border below the Razih mountains. The Egyptians began their move on Saturday morning, moving along the Haradh and Tashar ravines. On Saturday and Sunday afteroons they were caught in heavy rain and their vehicles, including twenty tanks and about forty armored cars sank axle deep into the mud. The defenders left them alone until Monday at dawn. Al-Badr left his headquarters at three that morning with 1,000 men to direct a counter attack in the Tashar ravine, while Abdullah Hussein attacked in the Haradh ravine.[47]
Meanwhile, the Egyptians had planned a coordinated drive from Sadah to the southwest, below the Razih mountains, hoping to link up with the force coming from Haradh. They were counting on a local sheik, whose forces were to supposed to join 250 Egyptian parachutists. The sheik failed to deliver, and the parachutists made their way back to Sadah, suffering losses from snipers on the way. Al-Badr had sent radio messages and summonses by runner in all directions calling for reinforcement. He asked reserve forces training in the Jawf to arrive in trucks mounting 55- and 57-millimeter cannon and 81 millimeter mortars and heavy machine guns. They arrived within forty-eight hours, in time to face the attackers. They outflanked the Egyptian columns, still stuck in mud in the ravines. They later announced they had knocked out ten of the Egyptian tanks and about half of their armored cars, and claimed to have shot down an Ilyushin bomber.[48] The royalists also carried out two supporting movements. One was a raid on Jihana, in which several staff officers were killed. The second was an attempt, involving British advisors and French and Belgian mercenaries from Katanga, to bombard San'a from a nearby mountain peak. Other diversionary operations included raids on Egyptian aircraft and tanks at the south airport of San'a and a mortar at the Egyptian and republican residence in a suburb of Taiz.[49] Although the Egyptians managed to drive al-Badr out of his headquarters to a cave on Jabal Shedah, they could not close the Saudi border. They declared victory on the radio and on the press, but were obliged to agree to a ceasefire on the upcoming Erkwit conference on November 2.[50]
[edit]Alexandria summit and Erkwit ceasefire

In September, 1964, Nasser and Faisal met in the Arab summit in Alexandria. By that time Egypt had 40,000 troops in Yemen and had suffered an estimated 10,000 casualties. In their official communiqué the two leaders promised to 1) cooperate fully to solve the existing differences between the various factions in Yemen, 2) work together in preventing armed clashes in Yemen, and 3) reach a solution by peaceful agreement. The communiqué was widely hailed in the Arab world, and Washington called it a "statesmanlike action" and a "major step toward eventual peaceful settlement of the long civil war." Nasser and Faisal warmly embraced at Alexandria's airport and called each other "brother". Faisal said he was leaving Egypt "with my heart brimming with love for President Nasser."[51]
On November 2, at a secret conference in Erkwit, Sudan, the royalists and republicans declared a ceasefire effective at 1:00 PM on Monday, November 8. Tribesmen of both sides celebrated the decision until that day, and for two days after it went into effect, they fraternized at several places.[52] On November 2 and 3, nine royalists and nine republicans, with a Saudi and an Egyptian observer, worked out the terms. A conference of 168 tribal leaders was planned for November 23. For the royalists, the conference was to become an embryo national assembly that would name a provisional national executive of two royalists, two republicans and one neutral, to administer the country provisionally and to plan a plebiscite. Until that plebiscite, which would decide whether Yemen would be a monarchy or a republic, both Sallal and al-Badr were to step aside.[53] At the end of the two days the Egyptians resumed their bombing of royalist positions. The conference planned for November 23 was postponed to the 30th, then indefinitely. The republicans blamed the royalists for not arriving, while the royalists blamed the Egyptian bombings.[54]
[edit]Royalist offensive

The camp used by royalist forces at Hanjar, in north-eastern Yemen.
Between December 1964 and February 1965 the royalists discerned four Egyptian attempts to drive directly into the Razih mountains. The intensity of these thrusts gradually diminished, and it was estimated that the Egyptians lost 1,000 men killed, wounded and taken prisoner. Meanwhile, the royalists were building up an offensive.[55] The Egyptian line of communications went from San'a to Amran, then Khairath, where it branched off north-eastwards to Harf. From Harf it turned due south to Farah, and then South-eastwards to Humaidat, Mutamah and Hazm. From Hazm it led south-eastwards to Marib and Harib. A military convoy went over this route twice a month. Since the royalists had closed the direct route across the mountains from San'a to Marib, the Egyptians had no other way.[56]
The royalists under the command of Prince Mohamed's objective was to cut the Egyptians' line and force them to withdraw. They intended to take over the garrisons along this line and establish positions from which they could interdict the Egyptian movement. They had prepared the attack with the help of the Nahm tribe, who tricked the Egyptians into believing that they were their allies and would take care of the mountain pass known as Wadi Humaidat themselves. The royalist deal was that the Nahm would be entitled to loot the ambushed Egyptians. The Egyptians may have suspected something was up, as they sent a reconnaissance aircraft over the area a day before the attack. The royalists thus occupied two mountains known as Asfar and Ahmar and installed 75-Millimeter guns and mortars overlooking the Wadi.[57] On April 15, the day after the last Egyptian convoy went through, the royalists launched a surprise attack. Both forces numbered at only a couple of thousands. The guns positioned on Asfar and Ahmar opened fire, and then the Nahm came out from behind the rocks. Finally, Prince Mohamed's troops followed. This time, the royalists' operation was fully coordinated by radio. Some of the Egyptians surrendered without resistance, others fled to Harah 800 yards to the north. Both sides brought reinforcements and the battle shifted between Harf and Hazm.[57]
Meanwhile, Prince Abdullah bin Hassan began to raid Egyptian positions north-east of San'a at Urush, Prince Mohamed bin Mohsin was attacking the Egyptians with 500 men west of Humaidat, Prince Hassan struck out from near Sadah and Prince Hassan bin Hussein moved from Jumaat, west of Sadah, to within mortar-firing distance of the Egyptian airfield west of Sadah. Fifty Egyptians surrendered at Mutanah, near Humaidat. They were eventually allowed to evacuate to San'a with their arms. Mohamed's policy was to keep officers as prisoners for exchange, and to allow soldiers to go in return for their arms. Three to five thousand Egyptian troops in garrisons on the eastern slopes of the mountains and in the desert now had to be supplied entirely by air.[58]

Egyptian bomb damage in a village near Marib.
The royalist radio tried to widen the split in republican ranks by promising amnesty to all non-royalists once the Egyptians were withdrawn. Al-Badr also promised a new form of government: "a constitutionally democratic system" ruled by a "national assembly elected by the people of Yemen". At Sallal's request, Nasser provided him with ammunition and troop reinforcements by transport plane from Cairo.[59] By August, the royalists had seven "armies", each varying in strength between 3,000 and 10,000 men, with a total somewhere between 40,000 and 60,000. There were also five or six times as many armed royal tribesmen, and the regular force under Prince Mohamed. In early June they moved into Sirwah in eastern Yemen. On June 14 they entered Qaflan and on July 16 they occupied Marib.[60] According to official Egyptian army figures, they had 15,194 killed.[61] The war was costing Egypt $500,000 a day. The royalists had lost an estimated 40,000 dead.[62] In late August, Nasser decided to get the Soviets more involved in the conflict. He convinced them to cancel a $500 million debt he had incurred and provide military aid to the republicans.[63] In early May, Sallal fired his Premier, General Hassan Amri, and appointed Ahmed Noman in his place. Noman was considered a moderate who believed in compromise. He had resigned as president of the republican Consultative Council in December in protest against Sallal's "failure to fulfill the people's aspirations". Noman's first act was to name a new 15-man Cabinet, maintaining an even balance between Yemen's two main tribal groupings, the mountain Zeidis, who are mostly royalist, and the Shafis, who are mostly republican.[62]
[edit]Khamir, Jeddah and Haradh conferences

Noman spoke over Radio San'a, offering reconciliation and inviting "all tribes of all persuasions" to meet with him the following week at Khamir, 50 miles north of San'a, to achieve "the one thing which we all prize over anything else: peace for the nation." In order to convince al-Badr to come the conference, Noman announced that he personally would head the republican delegation at Khamir, and that Sallal would stay in San'a.[62] Al-Badr and his ranking chiefs did not attend the conference, but a handful of pro-royalist sheiks were present. The conference named a committee of five tribal and four religious leaders who were charged with seeking out the "beguiled brothers", al-Badr and his friends. Noman's effort, including a private promise to reach a withdrawal of Egyptian troops, was backed by Nasser. Radio Cairo hailed the Khamir conference as the "dawn of a new era." Sallal called the talks "a complete success", while al-Badr stated that "It is essential that the conflict which has devastated our beloved country be brought to an end by peaceful negotiations between the Yemeni people themselves."[64] However, by early June, when Noman said that Egypt's 50,000 troops would have to be replaced by a joint royalist-republican peace force, the Nasserites lost interest in the deal. After Noman flew to Cairo to protest directly to Nasser, Sallal threw seven civilian Cabinet ministers into jail. Noman resigned, saying "It is obvious that Sallal and his cronies are more interested in war than peace". Sallal soon named a new Cabinet to replace Noman's, with 13 military men and two civilians.[65]

King Faisal at Jeddah.
By August, the war was costing Nasser $1,000,000 a day,[66] when he arrived in Jedda harbor aboard his presidential yacht Hurriah (Freedom) to negotiate with Faisal. It was Nasser's first visit to Saudi Arabia since 1956. At the request of the Egyptians, due to assassination rumors, the banners and flags normally put up to celebrate a visiting dignitary were omitted, the sidewalks were cleared of people, and the car was a special bulletproof model. On the evening of his arrival, Nasser was welcomed at a banquet and reception for 700 guests. In less than 48 hours they reached full agreement. Once the agreement was signed, Faisal embraced Nasser and kissed him on both cheeks.[67] The agreement provided for
The gradual withdrawal of the Egyptian force within a ten-month period and the cessation of all Saudi help to the royalists; and
The formation of a Yemen Congress of fifty, representing all factions, which would be charged with forming a transitional regime and establishing procedures for a national plebiscite to determine Yemen's future government.[67]
On November 23, the two sides met in Haradh. The first issue was the name of the transition state that was supposed to exist until a plebiscite could be held the following year. The royalists wanted the name "Kingdom of Yemen" but were willing to settle for a neutral title like "State of Yemen". The republicans insisted on having the word "republic" or "republican" in the title. It was agreed to suspend the conference until after the month-long fast of Ramadan, which was about to begin the following week.[68] The conference reached a deadlock when the Egyptians, possibly due to a tactical decision made by Amer, encouraged the republicans to take a headstrong stand.[63]
[edit]Nasser's "long-breath" strategy

Egypt had run up a foreign debt of nearly $3 billion, and the gap between exports and imports had widened to a record $500 million for 1965. On Victory Day in Port Said, Nasser conceded that "We are facing difficulties. We must all work harder and make sacrifices. I have no magic button that I can push to produce the things you want". Premier Zakaria Mohieddin raised Egypt's income tax, added a "defense tax" on all sales, and boosted tariffs on nonessential imports. He also hiked the cost of luxury goods 25% and set low price ceilings on most foodstuffs. He sent 400 plainclothesmen to Cairo's to arrest 150 shopkeepers for price violations.[69] In March 1966, the Egyptian forces, now numbering almost 60,000, launched their biggest offensive. The royalists counterattacked but the stalemate resumed. Egyptian-supported groups executed sabotage bombings in Saudi Arabia.[70]
In a speech on May Day, 1966, Nasser said the war was entering a new phase. He launched what he called a "long-breath strategy." The plan was to pare the army from 70,000 men to 40,000, withdraw from exposed positions in eastern and northern Yemen, and tighten the hold on particular parts of Yemen: the Red Sea coastline; a northern boundary that takes in the well-fortified town of Hajja and San'a; and the border with the South Arabian Federation, which was to become independent in 1968. Nasser insisted that attacks on Najran, Qizan and other "bases of aggression" would continue, arguing that "these were originally Yemeni towns, which the Saudis usurped in 1930".[71]
Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East and South Asia, flew in for talks with both Faisal and Nasser. In Alexandria, Nasser refused to pull out his troops, despite the risk of losing part or all of a new $150 million US food-distribution program, and another $100 million worth of industrial-development aid.[71] Later that month, Alexei Kosygin counseled Nasser not to risk a stoppage of the U.S. Food for Peace program because Russia could not afford to pay the bill. The Russians were also willing to aid Nasser with arms and equipment in Yemen, but feared that a widening of the conflict to Saudi Arabia would lead to a "hot war" confrontation in the Middle East. Nasser was warned that "the Soviet Union would be displeased to see an attack on Saudi Arabia."[72]
In October, Sallal's palace in San'a was shelled by a bazooka, and insurgents began targeting an Egyptian army camp outside the city and setting fire to Egyptian installations, killing a reported 70 Egyptian troops. Sallal arrested about 140 suspects, including Mohamed Ruwainy, the ex-Minister for Tribal Affairs, and Colonel Hadi Issa, former deputy chief of staff of the armed forces. Sallal accused Ruwainy and Issa of organizing a "subversive network seeking to plunge the country into terrorism and panic" and planning a campaign of assassination, financed by Saudi Arabia, Britain, Israel and the US. Ruwainy, Issa and five others were executed, while eight others received prison sentences ranging from five years to life.[73] In February, 1967, Nasser vowed to "stay in Yemen 20 years if necessary", while Prince Hussein bin Ahmed said "We are prepared to fight for 50 years to keep Nasser out, just as we did the Ottoman Turks." Tunisia broke diplomatic relations with the republic, saying that the Sallal government no longer has power to govern the country. Sallal's chargé d'affaires in Czechoslovakia flew to Beirut and announced that he was on his way to offer his services to the royalists. Nasser said that "As the situation now stands, Arab summits are finished forever."[74]
[edit]Gas warfare

The International Red Cross hospital at Uqd.
The first use of gas took place on June 8, 1963 against Kawma, a village of about 100 inhabitants in northern Yemen, killing about seven people and damaging the eyes and lungs of twenty-five others.[75] This incident is considered to have been experimental, and the bombs were described as "home-made, amateurish and relatively ineffective". The Egyptian authorities suggested that the reported incidents were probably caused by napalm, not gas. The Israeli Foreign Minister, Golda Meir, suggested in an interview that Nasser would not hesitate to use gas against Israel as well.[76] There were no reports of gas during 1964, and only a few were reported in 1965. The reports grew more frequent in late 1966. On December 11, 1966, fifteen gas bombs killed two people and injured thirty-five. On January 5, 1967, the biggest gas attack came against the village of Kitaf, causing 270 casualties, including 140 fatalities.[77] The target may have been Prince Hassan bin Yahya, who had installed his headquarters nearby.[78] The Egyptian government denied using poison gas, and alleged that Britain and the US were using the reports as psychological warfare against Egypt. On February 12, 1967, it said it would welcome a UN investigation. On March 1, U Thant said he was "powerless" to deal with the matter.[79]
On May 10, the twin villages of Gahar and Gadafa in Wadi Hirran, where Prince Mohamed bin Mohsin was in command, were gas bombed, killing at least seventy-five.[80] The Red Cross was alerted and on June 2, it issued a statement in Geneva expressing concern.[81] The Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University of Berne made a statement, based on a Red Cross report, that the gas was likely to have been halogenous derivatives - phosgene, mustard gas, lewisite, chloride or cyanogen bromide.[82] The gas attacks stopped for three weeks after the Six-Day War of June, but resumed on July, against all parts of royalist Yemen.[83] Casualty estimates vary, and an assumption, considered conservative, is that the mustard and phosgene-filled aerial bombs caused approximately 1,500 fatalities and 1,500 injuries.[77]
[edit]Egyptian withdrawal

Situation in North Yemen 1967 between Republicans (black) and Royalists (red)
By 1967, Egyptian forces relied exclusively on defending a triangle linking Hodeida, Taiz and San'a, while striking southern Saudi Arabia and North Yemen with air sorties.[2] In August, 1967, in order to make up for the 15,000 Egyptian killed, captured or missing, as a result of the Six-Day War, Nasser recalled 15,000 of his troops from Yemen.[84] Egypt imposed higher taxes on its middle and upper classes, raised workers' compulsory monthly savings by 50%, reduced overtime pay, cut the sugar ration by a third, and curtailed practically all major industrial programs. Only military expenditures were increased, by $140 million to an estimated $1 billion. Nasser also increased the price of beer, cigarettes, long-distance bus and railroad fares and admission to movies. Egypt was losing $5,000,000 a week in revenues from the closing of the Suez Canal, on the other side of which, the Israelis were sitting on the Sinai wells that had produced half of Egypt's oil supply. Egypt's hard-currency debt was now approaching $1.5 billion and its foreign-exchange reserves were down to $100 million.[85]
As part of the Khartoum Resolution of August, Egypt announced that it was ready to end the war in Yemen. Egyptian Foreign Minister, Mahmoud Riad, proposed that Egypt and Saudi Arabia revive their Jeddah Agreement of 1965. Faisal expressed satisfaction with Nasser's offer, and al-Badr promised to send his troops to fight with Egypt against Israel, should Nasser live up to the Jeddah agreement[86] Nasser and Faisal signed a treaty under which Nasser would pull out his 20,000 troops from Yemen, Faisal would stop sending arms to al-Badr, and three neutral Arab states would send in observers. Sallal accused Nasser of betrayal.[87] Nasser unfroze more than $100 million worth of Saudi assets in Egypt, and Faisal denationalized two Egyptian-owned banks that he had taken over earlier that year.[88] Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Kuwait agreed to provide Egypt with an annual subsidy of $266 million, out of which $154 million was to be paid by Saudi Arabia.[89]
Sallal's popularity among his troops declined, and after two bazooka attacks on his home by disaffected soldiers, he took Egyptian guards. He ordered the execution of his security chief, Colonel Abdel Kader Khatari, after Khatari's police fired into a mob attacking an Egyptian command post in San'a, and had refused to recognize the committee of Arab leaders appointed at Khartoum to arrange peace terms. He also fired his entire Cabinet and formed a new one, installing three army men in key ministries, and took over the army ministry and the foreign ministry for himself. Meanwhile, Nasser announced the release of three republican leaders who had been held prisoner in Egypt for more than a year, and who were in favor of peace with the royalists.[90] The three were Qadi Abdul Rahman Iryani, Ahmed Noman and General Amri.[91] When Sallal met with Nasser in Cairo in early November, Nasser advised him to resign and go into exile. Sallal refused and went to Baghdad, hoping to get support from other Arab Socialists. As soon as he left Cairo, Nasser sent a cable to San'a, instructing his troops there not to block an attempt at a coup.[92]
[edit]Siege of San'a

Prince Mohamed bin Hussein, deputy to Imam al-Badr, in command of the royalist forces besieging San'a, December 1967.
On November 5, Yemeni dissidents, supported by republican tribesmen called down to San'a, moved four tanks into the city's dusty squares, took over the Presidential Palace and announced over the government radio station that Sallal had been removed "from all positions of authority". The coup went unopposed. In Baghdad, Sallal asked for political asylum, saying "every revolutionary must anticipate obstacles and difficult situations".[92] The Iraqi government offered him a home and a monthly grant of 500 dinars.[93]
The new republican government was headed by Qadi Abdul Rahman Iryani, Ahmed Noman and Mohamed Ali Uthman. The Prime Minister was Mohsin al-Aini. Noman, however, remained in Beirut. He was doubtful of his colleagues reluctance to negotiate with the Hamidaddin family, preferring to expel it instead. On November 23, he resigned, and his place was taken by Hassan Amri.[94] Prince Mohamed bin Hussein told the country's chiefs "We have money, and you will have your share if you join us. If not, we will go on without you". The chiefs agreed to mobilize their tribes. 6,000 royalist regulars and 50,000 armed tribesmen known as "the Fighting Rifles" surrounded San'a, captured its main airport and severed the highway to the port of Hodeida, a main route for Russian supplies. In a battle twelve miles east of the capital, 3,200 soldiers of both sides were killed, and an entire republican regiment reportedly deserted to the royalists. Bin Hussein gave them an ultimatum: "Surrender the city or be annihilated".[95] Iryani went to Cairo for what the Egyptian official press agency called "a medical checkup". Foreign Minister Hassan Macky also left Yemen, leaving the government in charge of Amri. Amri declared a 6 p.m. curfew and ordered civilians to form militia units "to defend the republic". In Liberation Square, six suspected royalist infiltrators were publicly executed by a firing squad, and their bodies were later strung up on poles.[95]
The republicans boasted a new air force, while the royalists claimed to have shot down a MiG-17 fighter with a Russian pilot. The US State Department said that this claim, as well as reports of twenty-four MiGs and forty Soviet technicians and pilots who had arrived in Yemen, were correct. In January, the republicans were defending San'a with about 2,000 regulars and tribesmen, plus armed townsmen and about ten tanks. They also had the backing of a score or more fighter aircraft piloted by Russians or Yemenis who passed a crash course in the Soviet Union. The city could still feed itself from the immediately surrounding countryside. Between 4,000 and 5,000 royalists suffered from republican air power, but had the advantage of high ground. However, they did not have enough ammunition, as the Saudis had halted arms deliveries after the Khartoum agreement and stopped financing the royalists after December.[96]

By February, the siege was lifted and the republicans had essentially won the war.[97] Meanwhile, the British had withdrawn from the Federation of South Arabia, which had now become South Yemen.[98] The royalists remained active until 1970. Talks between the two sides commenced while the fighting went on. The Foreign Minister, Hassan Makki, said "Better years of talk than a day of fighting".[97] In 1970, Saudi Arabia recognized the Republic,[99] and a ceasefire was effected.[100] The Saudis gave the republic a grant of $20 million, which was later repeated intermittently, and Yemeni sheiks received Saudi stipends.[101] By 1971, both Egypt and Saudi Arabia had disengaged from Yemen.[2] South Yemen formed a connection with the Soviet Union.[102] In September 1971, Amri resigned after murdering a photographer in San'a, and more power was given to Iryani, the effective President. By then, the royalists were integrated into the new republic, except for al-Badr's family, and a consultative Council was established. Clashes along the border between the states rose, and in 1972 a small war broke.[101]
After the war, the tribes were better represented in the republican government. In 1969 sheiks were brought into the National Assembly and in 1971 into the Consultative Council. Under Iryani, the sheiks, particularly the ones who fought for the republicans and were close to the mediation attempt. By the end of the war there was a breach between the older and more liberal politicians and republican sheiks, and certain army sheiks and activists from South Yemen. In the summer of 1972 a border war broke and ended with a declaration from both North Yemen and South Yemen that they would reunite, but they did not.[103] There were complaints in North Yemen about foreign influence by Saudi Arabia.[101]
[edit]See also

Shia insurgency in Yemen
Muhammad al-Badr
Bruce Conde
Mutawakkilite Kingdom of Yemen
Saudi-Yemeni War
Aden Emergency
List of modern conflicts in the Middle East

^ a b Pollack (2002), p. 54.
^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Aboul-Enein, Youssef (2004-01-01). "The Egyptian-Yemen War : Egyptian perspectives on Guerrilla warfare". Infantry Magazine (Jan-Feb, 2004). Retrieved October 3, 2008.
^ Pollack (2002), p. 53
^ Pollack (2002), p. 55
^ "Mid-Range Wars and Atrocities of the Twentieth Century". Erols. Retrieved August 29, 2008.
^ Pollack (2002), p. 56
^ Sandler, Stanley. Ground Warfare: The International Encyclopedia. Vol.1 (2002): p.977. "Egypt immidiately began sending military supplies and troops to assist the Republicans... On the royalist side Jordan and Saudi Arabia were furnishing military aid, and Britain lent diplomatic support. In addition to the Egyptian aid, the Soviet Union allegedly supplied 24 Mig-19s to the republicans."
^ Oren (2002), p. 7
^ a b c "After Ahmad the Devil". Time. 1962-10-05. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Revolt & Revenge". Time. 1955-04-25. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Visitor from Cairo". Time. 1958-03-10. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ a b c "The Imam's Peace". Time. 1959-09-14. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Worn Out". Time. 1961-07-07. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 22
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 23
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 29
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 30–31
^ a b "Arabia Felix". Time. 1962-10-26. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 34
^ a b c "Diplomacy in the Desert". Time. 1962-12-07. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Fugitive from Bullets". Time. 1962-12-21. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ a b c d e "Pax Americana?". Time. 1962-12-28. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 185–186
^ "Trouble for the Sons of Saud". Time. 1962-11-23. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ a b Schmidt (1968), p. 186
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 190
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 190–191
^ a b "The U.S. Intervenes On Both Sides". Time. 1963-01-18. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 192–193
^ a b Schmidt (1968), p. 193
^ a b Schmidt (1968), pp. 193–194
^ a b Schmidt (1968), p. 195
^ a b "Another Job for the U.N.". Time. 1963-05-10. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Harried Are the Peacemakers". Time. 1963-06-21. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "The Mess in Yemen". Time. 1963-09-13. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 199–200
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 62–63
^ a b c Melman, Yossi (2008-10-17). "Our man in Sanaa: A Yemen president was once trainee rabbi". Haaretz. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
^ Safran (1988), p. 119
^ a b "For Allah & the Imam". Time. 1963-03-08. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Jones (2004), p. 136
^ a b Stern, Yoav (2004-07-26). "How Israel Intervened in the Civil War in Yemen". Haaretz. Retrieved October 2, 2008. (Hebrew)
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 168–169
^ a b Schmidt (1968), pp. 164–165
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 169–170
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 178–179
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 179–180
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 180
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 180–182
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 182
^ "The Alexandria Duet". Time. 1964-09-25. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 207
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 208–209
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 209
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 214
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 221–222
^ a b Schmidt (1968), p. 222
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 222–223
^ "Back to Bloodshed". Time. 1965-01-29. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 233
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 234
^ a b c "A Man to End the War". Time. 1965-05-07. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ a b Safran (1988), p. 120
^ "Appointment in Khamir". Time. 1965-05-14. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "A Preference for War". Time. 1965-07-16. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Journey to Jedda". Time. 1965-08-27. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ a b "No Time for Fanfare". Time. 1965-09-03. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Dialogue of the Deaf". Time. 1965-12-17. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Fewer Curses, More Sense". Time. 1965-12-31. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Safran (1988), p. 121
^ a b "Long Breath in Yemen". Time. 1966-05-13. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "The New Caution". Time. 1966-05-27. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "In the Old Style". Time. 1966-11-04. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Revolt Within a War". Time. 1967-02-17. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 257
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 259
^ a b "Egypt Profile: Chemical Overview". NTI. 2008-08. Retrieved August 28, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 260
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 263
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 264
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 265
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 267
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 268
^ "Divided in Defeat". Time. 1967-06-30. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Cruel & Difficult Struggle". Time. 1967-08-04. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Coping in Khartoum". Time. 1967-08-11. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Beginning to Face Defeat". Time. 1967-09-08. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "A Distant Peace". Time. 1967-09-15. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Safran (1988), p. 122
^ "Desperation of a Strongman". Time. 1967-10-20. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 291
^ a b "When Friends Fall Out". Time. 1967-11-17. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 293
^ Schmidt (1968), p. 294
^ a b "The Siege of San'a". Time. 1967-12-15. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ Schmidt (1968), pp. 296–297
^ a b Dresch (2000), p. 115
^ "Yoke of Independence". Time. 1967-11-24. ISSN 0040-718X. Retrieved August 26, 2008.
^ "Yemen: History". TDS. Retrieved August 29, 2008.
^ "Yemen". MSN Encarta. Archived from the original on 2009-11-01. Retrieved August 29, 2008.
^ a b c Dresch (2000), p. 124
^ Dresch (2000), p. 120
^ Dresch (1994), pp. 261-262
Dresch, Paul (1994-01-27). Tribes, Government, and History in Yemen. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 480. ISBN 0198277903.
Dresch, Paul (2000). A History of Modern Yemen. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521790921.
Jones, Clive (2004). Britain and the Yemen Civil War, 1962-1965: Ministers, Mercenaries and Mandarins: Foreign Policy and the Limits of Covert Action. Brighton ; Portland Or.: Sussex Academic Press. ISBN 9781903900239.
Oren, Michael B. (2002). Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East. U.S.: Oxford University Press. pp. 7–13, 39, 40. ISBN 0195151747.
Pollack, Kenneth M. (2002). Arabs at War: Military Effectiveness, 1948-1991. Studies in war, society, and the military. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. p. 698. ISBN 0803237332.
Safran, Nadav (1988-02). Saudi Arabia: The Ceaseless Quest for Security. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801494842.
Schmidt, Dana Adams (1968). Yemen: The Unknown War. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

الأربعاء، 23 نوفمبر 2011

مشروع رؤية سياسية مقدمة الى مؤتمر القاهرة تؤكد على إجراء استفتاء شعبي في الجنوب حول الوحدة اليمنية ((نص الرؤية ))

مشروع رؤية سياسية مقدمة الى مؤتمر القاهرة تؤكد على إجراء استفتاء شعبي في الجنوب حول الوحدة اليمنية ((نص الرؤية ))
الأحد , 20 نوفمبر, 2011, 12:38

القاهرة -صدى عدن- خاص:

أكدت مشروع رؤية سياسية مقدمة الى المؤتمر الأول لأبناء الجنوب الذي دشن اعماله في العاصمة المصرية القاهرة اليوم الأحد على ضرورة اجراء استفتاء شعبي في الجنوب حول الوحدة اليمنية وذلك بعد خمس سنوات من الحكم الفيدرالي من اقليمين بين شمال اليمن وجنوبه.

وتضمنت الرؤية السياسية التي وزعت اليوم الأحد في مستهل جلسات المؤتمر التأكيد على إعادة صياغة الوحدة في دولة اتحادية-فيدرالية يحمل اسم الدولة الجديدة من إقليمين شمالي وجنوبي بحدود 21مايو 1990م ، بدستور جديد يحتوى الضمانات الدستورية اللازمة لمنع إعادة إنتاج الدولة الراهنة المهترئة ويكفل تأمين سلامة مستقبل الشعب شمالا وجنوبا وارساء الأسس الراسخة لبناء الدولة المدنية الديمقراطية اللا أسرية و اللا فئوية واللاقبلية. و يمنع اى شكل من اشكال الهيمنة الاسرية أو القبلية أو الجهوية أو المذهبية أو العسكرية، وبما يضمن السيادة للدستور ولقوّة القانون فى عموم البلاد شمالاً وجنوبًا على حدّ سواء وبناء مقومات النجاح والشراكة والثقة لفترة خمس سنوات , بعدها يتم إجراء استفتاء لا بناء الجنوب لإعطائهم الحرية الكاملة في تحديد مستقبلهم.

بالإضافة إلى انتخاب “برلمان اتحادي" يتكون من غرفتين الأولى: "مجلس نواب"، والثانية "مجلس الشورى"، وكلاهما يتشكلان بالتساوي بين الإقليمين . ويكون الإقليم دائرة انتخابية واحدة فى الانتخابات الاتحادية , ويعد قانون جديد للانتخابات الاتحادية والإقليمية والمحلية.

ولاهمية الرؤية السياسية ينشر "صدى عدن " نصها كاملا

وثيقة رقم ( جنوبي 1 / 7 )

تحت شعار

ينعقد المؤتمر الجنوبي الأول

في الفترة من 20 – 22 نوفمبر 2011م


رؤية سياسية إستراتيجية لحل القضية الجنوبية

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

رؤية سياسية إستراتيجية لحل القضية الجنوبية


ان جوهر القضية الجنوبية تتمثّل في ان الوحدة الطوعية والسلمية المعلنة فى 22 مايو1990م أجهضت وتم القضاء عليها بحرب 1994م على الجنوب، وماتلاها من ممارسات اقصت شراكة الجنوب كشعب وارض وثروة. وبرغم نجاح النظام في صنعاء فى كسب الحرب عسكريا فى 7/7/94م ، الاّ انه فى الوقت نفسه اسقط شرعية الوحدة وفقا للاتفاق المبرم في 22 مايو 1990 بين الشمال والجنوب على أساس طوعى وسلمى.

وفي سياق تنديد المجتمع الدولي بتلك الحرب ونتائجها الظالمة، أصدر مجلس الأمن الدولى قراريه رقمى 924 و931 لعام 1994م . وكما أصبح معروفا للجميع فان النظام في صنعاء تنكّر ليس لقرارات مجلس الأمن وحسب وانما لتعهداته المكتوبة لمجلس الأمن الدولى ، مستمرا في نهجه المدمّر لكافة الأسس التي قامت عليها الوحدة، ومارس أبشع أشكال الهيمنة والالغاء والغطرسة الهمجية التي هدفت الى بسط كامل سيطرته العسكرية والأمنية على الجنوب، وفرض اجراءات قمعية تجلّت مظاهرها في أعمال النهب والفيد والاذلال والاقصاء وبث ونشر الفتن واستدعاء الثارات القديمة بين القبائل وتم بمنهجية استئصالية تفكيك مؤسسات دولة الجنوب المدنية ، الاقتصادية والثقافية والأجتماعية والقانونية وكذا الأمنية والعسكرية وتسريح كوادرها والعاملين بها والاستيلاء على موجوداتها الثابتة والمنقولة كغنائم حرب . .أن تلك الممارسات التي اعترف بها علنا مختلف الفرقاء المشاركين في تلك الحقبة التي تلت العام 1994 وحتى يومنا هذا, نقضت نقضا كليا وصريحا الصيغة الوحدوية التي سعى اليها باخلاص أهل الجنوب واستبدلتها بصيغة الحاقية بممارسة استعمارية كريهة حفزت و جذّرت مشاعر الرفض والمقاومة الشعبية العارمة من مختلف شرائح الشعب في الجنوب الأبي عبر الوسائل السلمية منذ 7/7/1994م وصولا لانطلاق الحراك الجنوبى الشعبى السلمى كحركة شعبية نضالية سلمية حاملة للقضية الجنوبية " كقضية سياسية بامتياز".

وفي الوقت الذي يقف فيه مجلس الأمن الدولي امام ازمة الجمهورية اليمنية الراهنة و المركبة ليصدر قراراته الجديدة، فان قراراته السالفة الذكر سارية المفعول لا زالت ماثلة أمامنا الى اليوم. وفي هذا السياق فان من المهم ان نؤكد أن أية معالجات جزئية انتقائية لا تستهدف جوهر الازمة حتما لن تزيد الأوضاع الملتهبة الا مزيدا من التعقيد تلحق بالغ الضرر بوشائج الأخاء والمحبة وتعرض الأمن والاستقرار للمخاطر. وعليه، فان المعالجة العادلة المقبوله من قبل شعب الجنوب هي تلك المعالجة الشاملة والمترابطة التي تتكامل فيها الحلول الدستورية والقانونية والسياسية والحقوقية والاقتصادية والاجتماعية، بما يجعلها تشكل حزمة إجراءات وبرامج وسياسات متكاملة تتفق عليها وتلتزم بتنفيذها مختلف مكونات قوى الثورة شمالا وجنوبا.

أسباب الانهيار ... سلطة اسرية قبلية فاسدة

لقد تظافرت السمات المعروفة للخلل الفادح في بنيان الدولة الموحدة في اعقاب حرب 94م مع السمات والعوامل الأخرى التي أدّت الى انهيار هياكل ومؤسسات الدولة، لتنتج حالة من اللّا دولة تجاوزت معايير الدولة الفاشلة لتتعداها الى ما هو أسوأ وأخطر، من خلال تفشي وتجذّر مقومات الطغيان والاستبداد العصبوي الفردي والأسري والقبلي، وتشجيع نمو مؤسسة الفساد وتكريس كل مظاهر غياب الحكم الرشيد وتكوين منظومة حاكمة قائمة على انتاج واستخدام كل عوامل التخلف السياسي والاجتماعي والثقافي لخدمة تسيّد سلطة اسرية قبلية فاسدة، اعتمدت للاحتفاظ بالسلطة على عملية تدمير ممنهجة لمؤسسات الدولة المدنية والعسكرية، واتّباع نهج شرير لتفجير الحروب الداخلية وإشاعة العنف والارهاب وتعميم الفساد والافساد ، وإشاعة الفوضى والاضرار بوشائج الأخاء والمحبة بين الشعب فى الشمال والجنوب وبث بذور التنابذ والفتن بين مختلف شرائح الشعب شمالا وجنوبا على السواء وحلّت النوازع المزاجية المتقلبة محل التقاليد المؤسسية ومحل القوانين والأنظمة، وجرت ممارسة أساليب الإقصاء السياسى وإفراغ الدولة من مضامينها الوطنية واختزالها فى هيئات سلطوية مهيمن عليها عائليا، وتمت عملية نهب جشعة غير مسبوقة للثروة واحتكارها. وقد أفضى كل ذلك إلى تكريس وتعميق أزمة سياسية مركبة وشاملة لطالما دأب النظام على مواجهتها باستخدام الوسائل القمعية ولجم الحريات العامة ، في تعبير جلي ومنطقي لعجزه عن امتلاك رؤية ومشروع وطني لمعالجة الأزمات المتفاقمة، بل على النقيض من ذلك فقد استمرأ الامعان في انكار وجود تلك المعضلات أصلا، وبالتالي اعتماد عملية تضليل شرسة داخلية وخارجية جنّد لها كل مهاراته الشيطانية المسكونة بالنزعات التسلطية وبأمراض التشبث بالسلطة وان على جماجم ودماء الشعب وصبره وتضحياته.

لقد استغلت سلطة 7يوليو الاسرية حالة التفكك والتشوّش والارتباك بين أوساط القوى الوطنية المناوئة لها ، والمتمثلة فى احزاب اللقاء المشترك والحراك الجنوبى الشعبى السلمى والحركة الحوثية وبقية القوى والتنظيمات السياسية عموما، فواصلت بعناد امتناعها عن اظهار ولو الحدّ الأدنى من التجاوب مع مطالب شعب الجنوب ثم التوجه نحو المعالجات الجادة والشاملة للمشكلات التى تواجهها البلاد. ان اصرار السلطة الحاكمة في صنعاء على الاستمرار في احتقار وقمع ارادة الشعب في الشمال والجنوب، أدّى الى حالة من الانسداد السياسي الخطير، وحالة من الانهيار والتآكل لما تبقى من أطلال وهياكل صورية للدولة، نتج عنها ما نراه اليوم من الشروخ العميقة التي حدثت في بنيان ووشائج الأخاء والمحبة بين مختلف شرائح وفئات الشعب جنوبا وشمالا. وكحصيلة طبيعية لتلك الحالة غدا من المستحيل استمرار الأوضاع على ما هى عليه، فتهيأت الظروف لانطلاقة الثورة الشبابية الشعبية العارمة والمظفرة بمشيئة الله.

النضال السلمي .. الطريق الى الثورة

وسيؤرخ المؤرخون الحقيقة التاريخية التي لا يمكن نكرانها أو تجاوزها البتة ، والقائلة بأن الثورة الشبابية والشعبية اليمنية استلهمت نهج النضال السلمى الدؤوب والمثابر الذى بدأه الحراك الجنوبى الشعبى السلمى عام 2007م . واستمرارا لتضحيات شباب الجنوب الثائر تجلّت سلمية الثورة الشعبية وعنادها واصرارها على الصمود وتقديم التضحيات في مختلف ساحات التغيير وميادين الحرية، والتي عبرّت عن طاقات إبداعية هائلة لجماهير شعبنا تصنع اليوم ملحمة نضالية سلمية عظيمة ستسجل بأحرف مضيئة في سجل التاريخ العربى المعاصر .

شراكة جديدة لمستقبل مشترك جديد

وإذا كانت المهمة الرئيسية الاولى للثورة الشبابية الشعبية والمتمثلة في إسقاط النظام ورحيل رأسه وكافة مكوناته العائلية تتسم بالوضوح والتوافق اللذان لا جدال فيهما، وتلتف حولها كافة الأطراف المشاركة في الثورة، فأن المهمة الرئيسية التالية مباشرة لمهمة ازاحة النظام الاستبدادي ورموزه، تتمثل في ضرورة الاجماع، بوضوح لا يشوبه أدنى غموض أو مراوحة، على أسس ومضامين حلّ القضية الجنوبية حلا عادلا يرتضيه شعب الجنوب ويعترف ويقبل بخياره الديمقراطى الحر. ان اية قراءة حصيفة لمسار الأحداث وتطورات وقائع ويوميات الثورة – بجوانبها الايجابية والسلبية - تفضي لا محالة الى ضرورة الاعتراف بحقيقة اجهاض واهتزاز الركن الأساس لبنيان الوحدة، وهو الشراكة الندية بين طرفيها المتعاقدين، وبالتالي الاقرار بطبيعة الخلل في علاقة الشراكة الندية بين الشمال والجنوب. ولا يستقيم هذا الاعتراف بتلك الحقيقة دون التأكيد كذلك على ان حل معضلة الوحدة، ، انما هو الضامن الوحيد لتوفير وانماء الشروط الضرورية للتسريع فى عملية إسقاط النظام وتحقيق الانتقال الآمن إلى المرحلة التالية لاعادة البناء.

ان من أهم الأسس أن تتم تلك الحلول على قاعدة الشراكة النديّة بين طرفى الوحدة الطوعية والسلمية المعلنة فى 22 مايو 1990م (شمال وجنوب) كما ان تلك المعالجات لا يمكن ان تؤسس لمستقبل مشترك جديد ان لم تضع في الاعتبار ضرورة الاعتراف المتبادل بهموم ومصالح كافة مكونات الشعب شمالا وجنوبا. ان جوهر تلك الرؤية الجامعة العادلة يتمثل في توفر الارادة المشتركة في اعادة بناء الدولة المدنية جنوبا وبناء الدولة المدنية شمالا على أسس جديدة كلية، والترجمة الصادقة من قبل كافة القوى السياسية والحزبية والاجتماعية في الشمال والجنوب لتطلعاتها من أجل الشروع في وضع الأسس الدستورية والقانونية والاجرائية الجادة لقيام الدولة الاتحادية الفيدرالية البرلمانية. ان الاعتراف بالحقيقة كما هي ، والالتزام بمنهجية جديد لإعادة صياغة الوحدة بما يخاطب المصالح الكلية للشعب جنوبا وشمالا ، انما يشكل الضمانة لاستعادة الثقة التي تعرضت لانتكاسات خطيرة في الفترة المنصرمة ، وهي الوسيلة المثلى لوضعنا جميعا على طريق نموذج جديد في العيش المشترك الحر الكريم، والعمل معا لترسيخ اسس وقيم المساواة والعدالة الاجتماعية والتنمية والأمن والاستقرار.

القضية الجنوبية .... حق تقرير المصير

ومع تسارع الأحداث على الساحة شمالا وجنوبا، وازدياد تفاعلاتها على المستويين الأقليمى والدولى، وباقتراب الثورة من تحقيق اولى اهدافها، انعقد لقاء القاهرة الجنوبى التشاورى فى مايو2011م كاستجابة واعية مسئولة للمستجدات والاحداث المتسارعة محليا واقليميا ودوليا، وللتعبير عن مكانة القضية الجنوبية كمحور رئيسى للأزمة الراهنة التى فجرت الثورة العارمة بصفتها امتداد للحراك الجنوبى الشعبى السلمى. وفي ذات السياق انعقد لقاءا جنوبيا آخرا فى بروكسل في تاريخ 25-26يونيو2011. كما واصل حزب رابطة ابناء اليمن اعلان رؤيته بشأن القضية الجنوبية. وتم كذلك عقد ملتقا جنوبيا لأبناء الجنوب فى صنعاء . وشهدت مختلف مدن ومناطق الجنوب اجتماعات وندوات دار فيها جدلا صحيا ناضجا حول أنجع السبل لبلوغ الهدف الأسمى المتمثل في تحقيق وصيانة المصالح العليا للشعب في الجنوب. وبالرغم من الاختلافات في الرؤى والسبل لبلوغ تلك الأهداف ، فان تلك اللقاءات والمشاورات الجنوبية عبّرت جميعها عن ادراك الجميع لأهمية تظافر وتنسيق الجهود المخلصة لحلّ القضية الجنوبية حلا يستجيب لتطلعات ابناء الجنوب المشروعة. وفي ظلّ ذلك التنوّع الصحي في الآراء كان هناك اجماعا لا يختلف عليه اثنان هو ان اي حل لا يخاطب جوهر القضية الجنوبية ويحترم خيارت شعب الجنوب في تقرير مصيرة ديمقرطياً لن يؤدى الا الى تكريس ذات الحالة من التفكك والتأزم بصورة يستحيل معها للأمور ان تستقيم ، و لن تفلح تلك المحاولات فى تجاوز القضية الجنوبية بل ستسهم في اعادة انتاج النظام القبلي الأسري العسكري المقيت ، وبالتالي ادخال البلاد في دوامة المزيد من الأزمات والمتاهات التى ستلقى بظلاله الداكنة على الأمن والاستقرار المحلى والأقليمى والدولى.

ومع تصاعد الحراك الجنوبى الشعبى السلمى ومع اشتداد عود الثورة الشبابية والشعبية ، وتحقيقهما لانتصارات مهمة في زحزحة ركائز الحكم الاستبدادي المنهار في صنعاء، فاننا نرصد ملامح قوّة دفع جديدة في المرحلة القادمة، ستشهد تسارع الجهود الأقليمية والدولية للتسريع بالعملية السياسية الشاملة. اننا نشهد حاليا ازدياد وتيرة القلق لدى المجتمع الدولي من استمرار الدكتاتور وبطانته الفاسدة في اعاقة تلك الجهود و جر البلاد الى اتون العنف والحرب والقتل والدمار. اننا نؤكّد هنا على ان تلك الجهود ينبغي ان تستهدف الاسراع في اجبار الدكتاتور واسرته وحاشيته على الكف عن المراوغة والتملّص من الالتزام بالقرارات الدولية التي تنص على تنحيه وتسليمه السلطة للشعب فورا ودون ابطاء.

وبما ان القضية الجنوبية هى المهمة التالية الأكثر الحاحا فمن الضروري التوافق بين كل القوى المنضوية تحت لواء الحراك الشعبي السلمي الجنوبي والثورة الشبابية الشعبية على المشاركة الحيّة النديّة لممثلي شعب الجنوب بكافة رؤاهم ووجهات نظرهم في العملية السياسية الجارية حاليا، وخصوصا ما يجري من مداولات وحوارات حول طبيعة المرحلة الانتقالية وأجندتها وأهدافها. ومن سالف القول التأكيد على انه لا يمكن لأي كان ان يتجاهل اليوم حقيقة ان لشعب الجنوب الأبي شرف المبادرة في مقاومة النظام المتخلف سلميا وهزّ ركائزة الخاوية، والتصدّي ببسالة منقطعة النظير لآلة القمع الوحشية. وفي سبيل أهدافه السياسية المعلنة قدّم الشعب في الجنوب قائمة طويلة من الشهداء الأبرار وعدد كبير من الجرحى والمعاقين والمشردين ، ولازال شعب الجنوب يدفع غاليا ثمن نضاله من خلال احتجاز عصابة صنعاء قسرا لحرية القائد الجنوبي المناضل الأخ حسن أحمد باعوم ونجله فواز وغيرهما من المحتجزين المعتقلين عقابا لهم على انتمائهم للحراك الجنوبى السلمى . كما لا زالت العصابة في صنعاء تمارس كل اشكال ومحاولات النيل من رموز الجنوب على كافة المستويات وفي مختلف المجالات، وعلى وجه الخصوص تواصل عصابة صنعاء حملة القمع الانتقامي القذر ضد صحيفة "الأيام" العدنية المستقلة الغرّاء وناشريها الأفاضل هشام وتمام باشراحيل و كتابها واسرة تحريرها. لقد سطر شعب الجنوب ملاحم بطولية في العطاء والوطنية تدعو للفخر والاعتزاز ، كانت بحق مقدمة ملهمة لاندلاع الثورة الشبابية الشعبية العارمة في عموم مدن وقرى اليمن .

وبناء على تلك الحقائق فان الضمانة الجوهرية لنجاح المرحلة الانتقالية التالية لسقوط الدكتاتور واسرته وحاشيته ستتحقق فقط من خلال الاتفاق على الحضور الفاعل والرئيسي والندّي للجنوب فى العملية السياسية القادمة، التى ينبغي ان تنطلق برعاية وضمانات اقليمية ودولية ، ولم يعد ذلك خيارا بل شرطا لازما للانتصار يصب فى مصلحة الشعب فى الشمال والجنوب.

خارطة طريق للقضية الجنوبية

من أجل الوصل الى حق ابناء الجنوب في تقرير المصير فقد اتفق ابناء الجنوب في مؤتمرهم الأول المنعقد بالقاهرة خلال الفترة من 19-21 نوفمبر2011م على الاستمرار في النضال السلمى المتصاعد وفق المحاور الرئيسية التالية :

المحور الاول : القضية الجنوبية

أولا : الاطار السياسى العام لحل القضية الجنوبية :

إن الحل العادل للقضية الجنوبية الذى لا يمكن لابناء الجنوب القبول بما هو أدنى منه يتحقق وفق الاتجاهات التالية :

I. الاعتراف والقبول الصريح بحق شعب الجنوب فى تقرير مصيرة عبر الوسائل الديمقراطية وبطريقة حرة وشفافة ، وبما يصون وشائج الأخاء والتعاون والتكامل ويضمن أنسياب مصالح الشعب شمالا وجنوبا ويعزز أمنه واستقراره بعيدا عن المصالح الذاتية والسلطوية للفئات الحاكمة ومصالح النخب السياسية والفئوية والحزبية ، وذلك عبر الآلية التالية:-

إعادة صياغة الوحدة في دولة اتحادية-فيدرالية يحمل اسم الدولة الجديدة من إقليمين شمالي وجنوبي بحدود 21مايو 1990م ، بدستور جديد يحتوى الضمانات الدستورية اللازمة لمنع إعادة إنتاج الدولة الراهنة المهترئة ويكفل تأمين سلامة مستقبل الشعب شمالا وجنوبا وارساء الأسس الراسخة لبناء الدولة المدنية الديمقراطية اللا أسرية و اللا فئوية واللاقبلية. و يمنع اى شكل من اشكال الهيمنة الاسرية أو القبلية أو الجهوية أو المذهبية أو العسكرية، وبما يضمن السيادة للدستور ولقوّة القانون فى عموم البلاد شمالاً وجنوبًا على حدّ سواء وبناء مقومات النجاح والشراكة والثقة لفترة خمس سنوات , بعدها يتم إجراء استفتاء لا بناء الجنوب لإعطائهم الحرية الكاملة في تحديد مستقبلهم. ينتخب “برلمان اتحادي" يتكون من غرفتين الأولى: "مجلس نواب"، والثانية "مجلس الشورى"، وكلاهما يتشكلان بالتساوي بين الإقليمين . ويكون الإقليم دائرة انتخابية واحدة فى الانتخابات الاتحادية , ويعد قانون جديد للانتخابات الاتحادية والإقليمية والمحلية . الدستور الفدرالي يحدد الاختصاصات والسلطات الفدرالية المركزية علاوة على بيان سلطات الاقاليم والمحافظات واختصاصاتها و تخصيص السلطات التشريعية بما فيها توزيع الموارد بين المستويات المختلفة. ولضمان تنفيذ الدستور تنشأ هيئة قضائية عليا ( المحكمة الدستورية الاتحادية ) تختص بالفصل فيما قد يثار من منازعات بين السلطات الفدرالية والاقاليم, حيث تطبق أسس ومبادئ الفدرالية بين الاقليمين وعلى مستوى كل اقليم , أخذا في الاعتبار اتفاقيات الحدود الدولية الموقعة بعد هذا التاريخ. ويحدد الفترة الانتقالية ومهامها وشروط وآليات الاستفتاء ويؤسس الدستور المتفق عليه لمرحلة جديدة ويكون بمثابة عقد مصالحة سياسية اجتماعية تاريخية لايجوز تجاوزه أو الالتفاف عليه.ينتخب "برلمانين إقليميين" بصلاحيات تشريعية إقليمية. وبدورها تنتخب رئيسي الإقليمين، ويكونا نائبين لرئيس الدولة الاتحادية الذى ينتخب من قبل المجلس الاتحادى . تشكل حكومة اتحادية بالمناصفة، وتضم الوزارات السيادية، وتشكل حكومة مستقلة لكل إقليم.إلى جانب الثروات العقارية والأراضى الزراعية والبيضاء تعتبر الثروات النفطية والمعدنية والسمكية ملكًا للإقليم ، ويدعم الإقليمان الميزانية الاتحادية بنسبة يتفق عليها وينص عليها فى الدستور.إعادة تشكيل الأجهزة الأمنية والشرطة على أسس إقليمية. ويتم اعادة هيكلة وبناء وتموضع القوات المسلحة والاستخبارات العامة على أسس اتحادية، تتناسب مع مهامها السيادية، وبما لايخل بالتوازن بين الاقليمين. وتحدد الضمانات الدستورية والقانونية لمنع الزج بالقوات المسلحة والأمن فى الشئون السياسية وفى الحياة المدنية للمواطنين .

II. الإزالة الكاملة لآثار حرب صيف 94م التى لحقت بالمؤسسات المدنية والأمنية والعسكرية لدولة الجنوب وبالممتلكات العامة والخاصة وبالحقوق والوكالات التجارية الخاصة لأبناء الجنوب. وتعويض المتضررين تعويضا عادلا ، مع احترام المصالح المشروعة التى تكونت فى الجنوب بعد حرب 1994م، و في نفس الوقت ضرورة إلغاء كل المصالح غير المشروعة التى تكونت بقوة النفوذ واستخدام السلطة، والتعويض عن الفترة التى استخدمت واستغلّت فيها هذه المصالح ، وتحديدًا فى مجالات النفط والغاز والمعادن والأسماك والأراضى وغيرها .

ثانيا : الجنوب لكل وبكل ابنائه:

الالتزام قولا وممارسة بما يلى:

1) جميع ابناء الجنوب شركاء فى صنع مستقبل الجنوب. فوحدتهم شرط اساسى للانتصار والتقدم والنماء وللامن والاستقرار مهما اختلفت او تباينت افكارهم ورؤاهم السياسية وانتماءاتهم الحزبية والسياسية. فالوحدة فى اطار التنوع ستكون اقوى وارسخ.

2) التسامح والتصالح مبدأ اقره ابناء الجنوب فى لقائهم التاريخى بجمعية ابناء ردفان بمدينة عدن عام 2006م ، الذي شكل الاساس المتين لانطلاقة الحراك الجنوبى الشعبى السلمى .

3) الابتعاد عن التصنيفات والتقسيمات للأفراد والجماعات وفقا لاختلاف الآراء والمواقف السياسية. فمن خلال تلك الممارسات اللا مدنية يتسلل ذوى النوايا السيئة لتغذية الطموحات الفردية الضارة وبث الفرقة بين ابناء الجنوب، وبالتالي اعاقة مسيرتهم النضالية السلمية من أجل استعادة مكانتهم وهويتهم التى عرف بها الجنوب واقام على اساسها دولته المعترف بها دوليا عشية الاستقلال الوطنى 30 نوفمبر1967م.

4) الحفاظ على وشائج الأخاء والمحبة والتعاون بين ابناء الجنوب والشمال مسالة فى غاية الأهمية. بل ترقى الى مستوى الخيار الاستراتيجي الذي يضمن تحقيق علاقة متينة تضمن الامن والاستقرار والنماء لابناء الجنوب والشمال على حد سواء. ان خيارات الوحدة السياسية او فك الارتباط ليست سوى وسائل تخدم الهدف الكبير المتمثل في صيانة و تحقيق المصالح العليا للشعب في كل من الشمال والجنوب. ان من المهم حفظ وصيانة عرى الأخوة والتعاون الذي لا مناص منها والقائمة على أسس راسخة من الثقة المتبادلة ومن المحبة والاحترام. لقد طال عبث النظام الأسرى وشائج الاخاء والمحبة بين ابناء الشمال والجنوب ، بل امتدت به نوازعه الشريرة لتشمل كذلك مشاعر ووشائج الاخاء والمحبة بين كل من ابناء الشمال أنفسهم ، و بين أبناء الجنوب أنفسهم. فاثار العديد من بؤر الفتن التى تبقيه سيدا على الجميع. ان الوقت حان للعمل الجاد والصادق لنفض غبار ذلك العبث والتخلص من آثاره لصنع مستقبل آمن لشعبنا ولمنطقتنا ولجوارنا.

ثالثا : التشكيل القيادي الجنوبي:

بهدف قيادة العمل السياسي حتى اقامة الدولة الاتحادية يتم تشكيل الأليات التنفيذية التالية :

1) تشكل مرجعية سياسية جنوبية موسعة تحت مسمى ( مجلس التنسيق الاعلى لابناء الجنوب ) تضم ممثلين عن كافة الطيف الجنوبى السياسى والاجتماعى، يحتكم اليها الجنوبيين من خلال الحوار حتى تحل القضية الجنوبية والانتقال للفترة الانتقالية التى تبدأ باقامة الدولة الاتحادية .

2) تشكل قيادة سياسية موحدة ( الهيئة التنفيذية ) ينبثق عن مجلس التنسيق الاعلى لا بناء الجنوب مهمتها توجيه وادارة الانشطة النضالية والسياسية لشعب الجنوب في الداخل والخارج. كما يناط بها مهمة الاشتراك فى اى حوار او تفاوض قادم بشان الوضع العام وحل القضية الجنوبية. وللهيئة الحق في تحديد ممثلى الجنوب ، وتكوين فرق عمل من الاختصاصين فى مختلف المجالات للاعداد لموضوعات الحوار او التفاوض والمشاركة في تحديد نتائجه.

3) يشكل مجلس قيادات وحكماء (الهيئة الاستشارية) والذي يتكون من القيادات التاريخية والشخصيات السياسية والاجتماعية من ابناء الجنوب الذين كان لهم دور في مراحل الجنوب المختلفة منذ ما قبل الاستقلال 67م وحتى بعد الوحدة. يقوم المجلس الاستشاري بتقديم الدعم والمشورة للمجلس التنفيذي لتمكينه من تحقيق أهدافه وانجاز المهام المناطة به.

4) يحد د المؤتمر بقرار قوام الهيئات وتشكل القيادة السياسية الموحدة وفق الاسس التالية :

التمثيل المتساوى للمحافظات مع إضافة عدد يعكس حجم السكان إلى كل محافظة ويقاس على أساس ممثل لكل 100.000 نسمة , بحيث يشمل ممثلي الحراك، الاحزاب، رجال الدين ، رجال الأعمال ، الشخصيات الأجتماعية ، الشباب ، المرأة، والمنظمات المهنية والابداعية. كما يمكن اشراك الشخصيات الجنوبية المشاركة بالسلطة والمؤمنة بالقضية الجنوبية والموافقة على الرؤية السياسية المحددة في هذه الوثيقة. ممثلين عن الخارج من المقيمين في الدول العربية وفي اوروبا وامريكا والدول الآسيوية والأفريقية. والشخصيات السياسية بالخارج.

5) تشكل فى كل محافظة ومديرية قيادة بنفس التركيب اعلاه.

رابعا :- أسس المشاركة فى العملية اسياسية :-

للمشاركة فى العملية السياسية لاخراج البلاد من ازمتها الراهنة يقر المؤتمر أساليب المشاركة وفق الاسس العامة التالية. وتناط بالقيادة مهمة حديد ما يلزم وفق المعطيات والمتغيرات:

1) القبول بالحوار بشأن حل القضية الجنوبية على اساس الشراكة الندية بين طرفى الوحدة، اى الشمال والجنوب، وبمشاركة كل القوى السياسية والاجتماعية فيهما، والمنضوية فى اطار المرجعية الجنوبية والقيادة السياسية المنبثقة عنها او المنسقة معه. ويترك للاخوة فى الشمال تحديد الآلية التى يرون المشاركة من خلالها.

2) تقوم القيادة الجنوبية بتحديد ممثلى الجنوب بالتنسيق مع مختلف المكونات والفعاليات السياسية والاجتماعية الجنوبية الغير منضوية فى المرجعية المنبثقة عن المؤتمر الاول لابناء الجنوب في القاهرة في الفترة من 19-21 نوفمبر 2011.

3) تحدد الفترة ماقبل الانتقالية بـــــ 12 الى 18 شهرا ، ومن بين اولويات مهامها الشروع فى معالجة آثار حرب 1994م على الجنوب واعداد الدستور الاتحادى والاستفتاء علية كمهمة رئيسية. على ان تتم مشاركة الجنوب في الهيئات واللجان الاختصاصية بصورة نديّة.

4) تتم العملية الحوارية برعاية وضمانات اقليمية ودولية .

المحور الثانى : - اعادة بناء النظام السياسى

اولا : أضافة الى ماتقدم، تعتمد الأسس التالية لاعادة بناء النظام السياسي الجديد:

يكون النظام السياسي للدولة الاتحادية الفيدرالية باقليمين شمالي وجنوبي – نظاما فيدراليا- برلمانيا ديمقراطيا وعلى ان يطبق النظام الفدرالي على مستوى كل اقليم.ترسيخ أسس الديمقراطية والتعددية الحزبية والسياسية وضمان حق التداول السلمى للسلطة .إعادة بناء القضاء على المستويين الاتحادي والاقليمي على أسس جديدة تحقق لهما الاستقلالية والنزاهة والتحديث.وضع نظم وهياكل مؤسسية لمحاربة الفساد من مختلف الأنواع بصرامة فى مختلف المستويات.اعتماد نظام اقتصادي ومالي اتحادي يسمح بتسخير كل الطاقات والامكانيات العامة والخاصة نحو التنمية المادية والبشرية المستدامةانتهاج سياسة اقتصادية اتحادية تعتمد على اقتصاد السوق. احترام حقوق الانسان ومواثيق الامم المتحدة والجامعة العربية ومنظمة التعاون الاسلامي.اقامة علاقات شراكة وتكامل وأخوّة وصداقة مع دول الجوار.انتهاج سياسة خارجية قائمة على الاحترام المتبادل وعدم التدخل في الشؤون الداخلية للدول.

ثانيا : محاربة الإرهاب :

1- تشكيل هيئة شعبية لمكافحة الارهاب .

2- مراجعة وضع الأجهزة الأمنية المكلفة بمكافحة الإرهاب لتعزيز مهنيتها بعيدًا عن أى حسابات سلطوية أو فئوية.

3- الشراكة الكاملة مع دول الجوار والمجتمع العربى والدولى فى محاربة الإرهاب وتجفيف منابعه واعتبار محاربته مصلحة وطنية عليا .

4- إقرار قوانين وإجراءات واضحة لمحاربة الإرهاب ومحاسبة أى خرق لها أو استغلالها للحد من حرية الرأى والمعتقد أو تسخيرها لاهداف سياسية لخدمة السلطة.


ان الوثيقة المطروحة للنقاش فى مؤتمرنا هذا تاتى كخطوة على نفس الطريق الذى سلكناه لتوحيد رؤى مختلف القوى الجنوبية ومختلف شرائح الشعب في جنوبنا الحبيب فى اطار جامع يحترم كل الخيارات والرؤى ويتيح لها فرص التفاعل فالوحدة فى اطار التنوع ستكون اقوى وارسخ وحاملا ومحركا فاعلا لانتصار القضية الجنوبية العادلة . و نؤكد مرة أخرى بأن نضالنا سيشهد حراكا نوعيا جديدا خلال الفترة التالية باتجاهين اثنين رئيسين متلازمين. أولهما مواصلة العمل لدعوة كل الأخوة الجنوبيين لتوحيد الرؤى ولتطوير العمل المشترك والآليات والأساليب النضالية السلمية . والآخر هو العمل المشترك البنّاء المرتكز على الثقة المتبادلة مع الأخوة في قوى الثورة الشبابية الشعبية واحزاب اللقاء المشترك وغيرها من القوى والشخصيات الوطنية الفاعلة في الشمال، من أجل التسريع في دحر الدكتاتورية والتوجه معا يدا بيد نحو اعادة البناء على الأسس التي أوردناها في وثائق هذا المؤتمرالمبارك والموفق بمشيئة الله .

كما اننا لن نألوا جهدا من أجل التنسيق والتعاون البنّاء مع القوى الأقليمية والدولية الشقيقة والصديقة التي يهمها أمن واستقرار اليمن شماله وجنوبه. مؤكدين للجميع بأن الجنوب لن يكون سوى ركنا أساسيا وجوهريا مساهما وضامنا لأمن واستقرار وتنمية اليمن وصيانة وحفظ الأمن والاستقرار الاقليمى والدولى.

اننا ونحن نترحم على الأرواح الطاهرة لشهداء الحراك والثورة الشبابية الشعبية الأبرار، و نعرب عن مواساتتنا ومؤازرتنا بكل الطرق النضالية لاسر الشهداء والمعتقلين والجرحى ، ونعبر عن شديد استنكارنا لاستمرار بقايا النظام فى احتجاز المناضل حسن احمد باعوم وابنه فواز ونطالب بسرع الافراج الفورى عنهما . المجد والخلود للشهداء والشفاء للجرحى والنصر للشعب ... .

"والله ولى التوفيق".